Apropos of a review, we refer to the Rating system. Rating system is currently used by the ITTF to rank the qualified players based on a single figure, attempts to measure their level of play, thereby facilitating any comparison, a little in the way of chess ELO example.
And that is assuming that every player has a level of play, a player would be better than another if it has comparatively a better game than this, and given that at a given time, there is only one level of play for each player, then it is justified, a single grade for this purpose. Rating
system with single figure then becomes more efficient, since it seeks to reward quality performance but before the volume of tournaments as it is now, which would exempt the athletes to play multiple categories and tournaments rated power at all, as in the current system.
Because if it is the "level of play" and it is desirable that this increase, the best way to measure their improvement, is when an Upset , Creole or a "blow to the cock" , when a lower ranking player beats another with a better location. And since the level of play is unique and depends on the instance or category in which they play, but rather evolves in time according to the degree of training received, all Upset should be rewarded by the system score, whether to produce this series pending keys. This would be a great incentive for players to overcome.
Similarly, the highest ranking player to be awarded a penalty for his fall with what was inferred to beat lesser players score would not give any additional bonus.
The problem of the current system is not used to measure the level of play of a table tennis player, so it does not necessarily set at the top are best presented game level, but rather may be the case that whoever has more financial means to travel to distant tournaments preference and low-level, easy to score points, which makes the system , an elitist system, contrary to the objectives of mass to which it aspires.
addition, the current system discourages mass participation of players, as it is very expensive and almost meaningless to those who are not located in the top places, participate in paintings dominated the top 8 ranking. And it is very difficult to overcome in another player level trained. For example Maria Claudia Soto, about whom we have referred recently has had to train for years to recently be able to beat a few months ago and surpassing what was unbeatable in the category leader, Angela Mori.
Thus, under current conditions, a player who recently venturing into any category, and worse starting seed for lack of scoring, would have to reach an Upset rate to boot, something extremely difficult as we mentioned, for a novice , which usually ends up discouraging the player from further participation. That is why today we see tournaments with little 2 series or even unique series in official category. And calls for selective, is played with fewer players than scheduled (programmed keys to 16 and are 10, 9, and even less).
to have a rating system, the player who perhaps had good performance in its category, this would cost him to aspire to a better location to move up in weight, so that its location would be based more on performance, which in luck.
Another serious additional scores should not initialized (reset to zero) start of each season. If you play with the idea of \u200b\u200b"defending the points" as in the tennis field, plus the regular reward as its rating would improve or would fall if your skill level is not maintained or improved. If considered for planting the last performance the player would be forced to play "all" Championships en cada temporada, podría ser ser mas selectivo a la hora de jugar torneos, posibilitando el otorgamiento de espacio para la apariciòn de nuevos aspirantes. Por supuesto, estos cálculos y consideraciones solo serian posibles de contar con un solo rating calificatorio y no varios como es ahora.
0 comments:
Post a Comment