Announcement Letter Of New Project

The Rating System II

About the rating issue has agreed that came out very interesting documentation on the website of the LATTU about how to calculate the happy antics.
According to these, are part of a truism, and little by little they are adding the flats. So, you gain points as win games and lose points if you lose matches. But there are points to consider category: some of the type "Expected Results" and others such as "Results unexpected ". The first are those wins against lower ranked players while the latter are those who win when they beat someone of higher ranking. On the other hand, win or lose more points as may be greater or lesser initial score difference between the players before playing the game.
addition also takes into account the type of tournament, so that more weight is for example a World Cup or Olympics a tournament Pro-Tour. also very Interestingly the penalty for failure to submit to a party in the event being scheduled. Failure to appear without justification, removes a volume of points. If something like that applies here, surely decrease the number of WO that occur with frequency and tarnish our tournaments.
now very important, you get "points" as seen as the result regardless of the instance of the game, understand series and keys. While there are "bonus points" (other than the basics) that are awarded according to the position reached, usually there himself, from being passed series. So, as we said in the previous post, would not fail to reward any well Upset occur in series, and be so rare that give color to the tournament, if it occurs.
There are other considerations but we find this interesting system more manageable, more clear, especially more just does not seem so difficult to implement. Pra

entertain here I present the match, end of 18 years AELU 2010, between the visit, the Brazilian Jeff Yamada against our credit Alonso Shimabukuro who end up imposing and enforcing the house, which always should be sought to achieve when organized a tournament.
Start with the end of the 1st set, Jeff wins it, then continues into the third set, and there is already followed. As we said the result was 3-2 in favor of partial Peruvian -14, -4,11,8,6. (For fans of Maria Claudia is seen in the party of the fund in the ladies free before the end of the defense keeping Espineira who defeated unbeaten against it. About Marisol is an interesting note here )

Super Bowl Weekend Deals On Lcd Tvs

Rating System

Apropos of a review, we refer to the Rating system.
Rating system is currently used by the ITTF to rank the qualified players based on a single figure, attempts to measure their level of play, thereby facilitating any comparison, a little in the way of chess ELO example.
And that is assuming that every player has a level of play, a player would be better than another if it has comparatively a better game than this, and given that at a given time, there is only one level of play for each player, then it is justified, a single grade for this purpose. Rating
system with single figure then becomes more efficient, since it seeks to reward quality performance but before the volume of tournaments as it is now, which would exempt the athletes to play multiple categories and tournaments rated power at all, as in the current system.

Because if it is the "level of play" and it is desirable that this increase, the best way to measure their improvement, is when an Upset , Creole or a "blow to the cock" , when a lower ranking player beats another with a better location. And since the level of play is unique and depends on the instance or category in which they play, but rather evolves in time according to the degree of training received, all Upset should be rewarded by the system score, whether to produce this series pending keys. This would be a great incentive for players to overcome.
Similarly, the highest ranking player to be awarded a penalty for his fall with what was inferred to beat lesser players score would not give any additional bonus.
The problem of the current system is not used to measure the level of play of a table tennis player, so it does not necessarily set at the top are best presented game level, but rather may be the case that whoever has more financial means to travel to distant tournaments preference and low-level, easy to score points, which makes the system , an elitist system, contrary to the objectives of mass to which it aspires.
addition, the current system discourages mass participation of players, as it is very expensive and almost meaningless to those who are not located in the top places, participate in paintings dominated the top 8 ranking. And it is very difficult to overcome in another player level trained. For example Maria Claudia Soto, about whom we have referred recently has had to train for years to recently be able to beat a few months ago and surpassing what was unbeatable in the category leader, Angela Mori.
Thus, under current conditions, a player who recently venturing into any category, and worse starting seed for lack of scoring, would have to reach an Upset rate to boot, something extremely difficult as we mentioned, for a novice , which usually ends up discouraging the player from further participation. That is why today we see tournaments with little 2 series or even unique series in official category. And calls for selective, is played with fewer players than scheduled (programmed keys to 16 and are 10, 9, and even less).

to have a rating system, the player who perhaps had good performance in its category, this would cost him to aspire to a better location to move up in weight, so that its location would be based more on performance, which in luck.

Another serious additional scores should not initialized (reset to zero) start of each season. If you play with the idea of \u200b\u200b"defending the points" as in the tennis field, plus the regular reward as its rating would improve or would fall if your skill level is not maintained or improved. If considered for planting the last performance the player would be forced to play "all" Championships en cada temporada, podría ser ser mas selectivo a la hora de jugar torneos, posibilitando el otorgamiento de espacio para la apariciòn de nuevos aspirantes. Por supuesto, estos cálculos y consideraciones solo serian posibles de contar con un solo rating calificatorio y no varios como es ahora.

Why Would My Dogs Nippels Get Bigger

The party MC vs Maria Claudia Soto AM

Gracias al dato de un seguidor, nos fue posible acceder y compartir el partido de ADECORE 2010 entre las juveniles Angela Mori representado al colegio Sophianum vs Maria Claudia Soto representando al Canonesas.
El partido culmino 3-0 a favor de MC y le permite obtener el título de jugadora más valiosa del torneo al mantenerse invicta en el.

Si no me equivoco, is from this game than Maria Claudia impose its supremacy on Angela forever 3-0, as the MC again winning 18 Semifinals Chicago Ladies 3-0 (8,4,8) and also in the semifinals of AELU Free Ladies 3-0 (2,3,10).



PD:
Although a please would have been nice, serve an interesting query from a follower on the outcome of John 23 vs Canonesas meeting over the Adecore Damas 2010 ( why was 3-1 and not 3-2? grrrr! ) because here the details of the meeting, which basically shows that everything is a thing of the lot.

Translating : Sophianum ABCAB played in the order, being the player A (Angela). While playing in the order Canonesas XYZYX, being the player X (Maria Claudia) and shocks were
AX (Canonesas 1 / Sophianum 0), BY (Canonesas 1 - Sophianum 1), CZ (Canonesas 1 - Sophianum 2), AY (Canonesas 1 - Sophianum 3, Angela won here with partial 11-0,11-0,11-1 against sub-10 Nicole Rivera, (), and there ended, and not played it would have been BX Meyling match vs Maria Claudia Soto War, which would have been interesting to see, that maybe could disturb Meyling MC, clear that in its confrontations with each other, until that date at least, had always been imposed Maria Claudia. Thus it is enough to MC only win in practice Silvia and Angela and took the title. Of course that once had more figures and the matter was more difficult, but not the fault of MC Adecore level is decreasing every year.

Graduating When To Start Applying For Jobs

just snatch first place in the global ranking of higher-between Peruvian-Angela Mori who kept him for a long time. Maria Claudia belonging to the generation born in 1994, is currently youth category and has just finished high school, therefore faces a new and difficult stage full of decisions.
Here is a fragment of the Super League website that best described in relation to its participation in the school tournament ADECORE still important:
" Maria Claudia, formed in the table tennis workshop at his school by Professor Joseph Sebastian, holds a very special affection for this tournament and it was he who marked his competitive debut in 2003 with just three months practicing this sport. At that time did not win one in September. Three years later, thanks to his hard work and dedication , won the gold medal with the recalled trio also formed Lucia Watanabe and Celeste Vargas. This outstanding athlete finished unbeaten on five occasions during 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 and 2010 and was named for the second consecutive player of the tournament.

In their last match of ADECORE, beat nationally ranked also Angela Mori (Sophianum) 3-0 in the most anticipated game of the tournament.

MC with juvenile girls team at his school.

Maria Claudia demonstrated a high level of technical disputing perhaps his best game all these years of participation in this championship. Thus, ended his career in the most important tournament of table tennis school with two gold medals in women under (2006-2007), two silver in ladies medium (2008) and older women (2009), and a bronze in the women under (2005). "Here is an excerpt

Party Adecore 2010, Silvia Lion vs Juan XIII, where MC end prevail.

Electric Shaver Ingrown Hair

Closing: Releasing

Diego Rodriguez Diego vs Johan Chavez
complained of ankle at the end.
Laura J. Sevillano vs
Nieto (scenes from the 1st set, semi-free) and Laura
had defeated 2 times in 18. Nieto would win this time 3-1.

Endpoints:
the end, the unforced errors by Laura weighed against him.

Endpoint Gustavo Flores Fernando Inca vs Gustavo
Important victory happened in the final.